Sexism in the governmentplace : World Bank’s Women, Business and the Law 2018 report.

The World Bank recently released their biennial Women, Business and the Law report. The report starts with an interesting anecdote.

Now consider the case of Svetlana Medvedeva, who studied navigation in college and graduated as a navigation officer in the Russian Federation. She applied to work as a ship’s helmsman and was selected. Later she was told she could not have that job as Regulation No. 162 lists helmsman as one of the 456 jobs deemed too arduous, harmful or dangerous for women.

Medvedeva went to court but after five long years, nothing happened and the ban still remains in place. Across the world, such regulations hampering gender equality still exist. According to the report, 104 countries have laws which prevent women from working in specific jobs and 18 countries have laws which allow husbands to legally prevent their wives from working. Meanwhile, in 59 countries there are no laws on sexual harrasment in the workplace.

For the first time, the report also provides scores for each country based its performance on seven indicators: accessing institutions, using property, getting a job, providing incentives to work, going to court, building credit and protecting women from violence. The scores range from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best. Unsurprisingly, the OECD high income countries (think UK, New Zealand, Spain) perform the best on these parameters. The worst performers are mostly from the Middle East and North Africa.

Twenty-one economies from across 5 regions receive a score of 0 in the protecting women from violence indicator. In the Middle East and North Africa, 35% of the economies score 0 in this indicator, as do 19% of economies in Sub- Saharan Africa.

The report brings to light the shocking practices followed by countries in which women are practically treated as second-rate citizens. In, Equatorial Guinea a woman needs her husband’s permission to sign a contract. In Chad, Guinea-Bissau and Niger, married women cannot open bank accounts without their husbands’ permissions. Fortunately, in Iran, women now have the luxury of not bringing along a guardian while applying for passports.

Restrictions on jobs

Laws that were made for a different century still apply in many places. These legacy legislations largely reflect outdated standards of safety.

Restrictions on women’s work in mining in many Commonwealth economies, for example, can be traced back to the United Kingdom’s Mines and Collieries Act of 1842. Currently, almost half of Commonwealth economies place limits on the jobs women can do.

Though conditions have improved for both men and women over time, many gender-based restrictions remain. Industry restrictions, such as those on mining, are particularly common. Sixty five economies restrict women from working in mining. Women also face job restrictions in industries such as manufacturing (47 economies), construction (37 economies), energy (29 economies), agriculture (27 economies), water (26 economies) and transportation (21 economies).

And to top it all, in 29 of the 189 economies covered, women cannot work the same night hours as men.

Screen Shot 2018-04-13 at 1.11.43 AM

You might say- but Aditya, if certain jobs/working hours are really risky, isn’t it better to stop bad things from happening to people? While that argument sounds good, unfortunately, that’s not how the world works. There is risk in almost every activity that we do. There is some possibility that you might die in a car accident, or while crossing the road. You might get food poisoning when you decide to eat some delicious street food. But people consume street food anyway. Cars are driven every day and roads are crossed too because we calculate probabilities of a bad event happening and decide that it’s probably worth taking the risk. People who decide to work in a mine do it not out of thrill, but because of their desperation for a job. If people are allowed to do risky activities like skydiving for fun, then what right does the government have to prevent honest, hardworking women (and indeed people) from looking for a way to earn a living? Especially for poor women, by banning them from working in “dangerous industries” or “at night”, governments take away the only asset that they have – their labour.

Seen and the Unseen

I don’t agree with all things that the reports classifies as good for women. For e.g.: Zambia is depicted in positive light for passing the Gender Equity and Equality Act which now mandates equal remuneration for work of equal value. While I appreciate the good intentions with which one might of think of mandating equal pay for equal work, it is important to understand why exactly do women face a penalty in the workplaceInterestingly, the answer is hidden within the document itself.

The cost of hiring women of childbearing age is higher for employers in economies in which laws mandate that employers pay for leave benefits…

Technically, the government could pay all the maternity benefits to companies and essentially make the cost of maternal benefits to the company equal to zero. But considering that 91.2% of working women in Zambia work in the informal sector (Ministry of Labour and Social Security, 2016), any expenditure on social protection should probably be directed to the poor rather than the well off persons in formal sector jobs.

It’s time for sexist governments to repeal their archaic laws. Allowing women to work in industries of their choice and at hours of their choice will empower them to earn additional income. A rise in incomes of women is accompanied by a host of other benefits. Economies will grow faster as a valuable resource is freed up to do productive work, earning women everywhere will have better bargaining power within the household, and parents will be willing to invest more in the education of a girl child when they see an increase in the return to education.

2 thoughts on “Sexism in the governmentplace : World Bank’s Women, Business and the Law 2018 report.

  1. Good one on government paying maternity benefits. Both social and economics impacts of greater women participation can be humungous in India. How about some % corporate tax rebate for >80% women workforce!?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s